As a General Counsel, what impact does a bad hiring process have?

Autor Georgia Morgan-Wynne
Juli 1, 2023


Do you know what impact does a bad hiring process could potentially have on your business‘ recruitment and retention? A staggering 80% of candidates say a negative interview experience can cause them to reject an offer. In a competitive legal market where top talent is scarce and reputation matters, this statistic should be a wake-up call for hiring managers and legal teams. The interview process is not just a mechanism for assessing candidates, it’s a reflection of your company’s culture, values, and professionalism.

Unfortunately, many candidates applying directly to legal roles continue to report poor experiences. These stories are not just disappointing, they’re damaging. They affect your employer brand, reduce the likelihood of attracting future talent, and can even impact client perception if word spreads.

Some of the most concerning examples include:

  • No feedback after a seven-stage interview process: Candidates invest significant time and energy preparing for interviews. To go through seven stages and receive no feedback is not only discourteous, it’s demoralizing.
  • Ghosted after a final stage interview despite multiple follow-ups: Silence after a final interview, especially when a candidate has followed up professionally, signals a lack of respect and process integrity.
  • Three times promised feedback, with dates continually pushed back: This creates confusion and frustration, leaving candidates feeling undervalued and misled.
  • A Black female candidate only met white men in three rounds of interviews: This raises serious concerns about diversity, equity, and inclusion in the hiring process.
  • Additional stages added after being told the process was complete: Changing the goalposts mid-process undermines trust and suggests disorganization.

These experiences are not isolated. They are increasingly common in the legal sector, particularly in direct applications where HR and hiring managers may not be aligned or where processes lack structure and accountability.

Why candidate experience matters

Candidate experience is more than just a “nice to have.” It directly impacts your ability to attract, hire, and retain top legal talent. A poor experience can lead to:

  • Offer rejections: Even if the role is attractive, candidates may walk away if the process feels disrespectful or chaotic.
  • Negative word of mouth: Legal professionals often operate in close-knit networks. A bad experience can quickly become a reputational issue.
  • Reduced engagement: Candidates who feel undervalued during recruitment are less likely to be engaged if they do join.
  • Brand damage: Your recruitment process reflects your company’s professionalism. Poor experiences can tarnish your brand in the eyes of both candidates and clients.

The role of HR and hiring managers

If a candidate enters your recruitment process, you should do your best to ensure a positive experience, regardless of whether you decide they are the hire you want to make. This requires collaboration between legal teams and HR, clear communication, and a commitment to treating candidates with respect.

Here are five practical steps you can take to improve candidate experience in legal recruitment:

1. Strategy: Define the purpose and timeline of each stage

Before launching a recruitment process, take time to define the purpose of each interview stage. What are you assessing? Who needs to be involved? How long will each stage take?

Once you’ve mapped this out, communicate it clearly to candidates at the outset. Let them know how many stages to expect, who they’ll meet, and when decisions will be made. This transparency builds trust and sets expectations.

Consistency is key. If you say there will be three stages, avoid adding more unless absolutely necessary, and explain why if you do.

2. Communication: Keep it clear, timely, and respectful

Communication is the cornerstone of a positive candidate experience. Long delays between interviews or feedback can create anxiety and erode confidence. Candidates may begin to question whether they’re still being considered or whether the company values their time.

Make it a priority to:

  • Respond to candidate emails promptly
  • Provide updates even if there’s no decision yet
  • Share timelines and stick to them
  • Avoid ghosting, always close the loop, even if the answer is no

Timely communication shows professionalism and respect. It also helps maintain momentum, which is critical in competitive markets where candidates may be exploring multiple opportunities.

3. Stages and format: Keep it focused and efficient

Legal roles require a mix of technical expertise and interpersonal skills. However, this doesn’t mean you need a six-stage process to assess them. In most cases, two to three well-structured stages are sufficient.

Consider using video interviews for initial conversations, especially if the role is hybrid or remote. This saves time and allows for broader scheduling flexibility. For final stages, in-person interviews can help assess cultural fit and build rapport.

Avoid unnecessary repetition or overlapping assessments. Each stage should have a clear purpose and build on the previous one.

4. Interview panel: Be intentional and inclusive

The composition of your interview panel matters. Large panels can be intimidating and make it difficult for candidates to engage meaningfully. Ideally, keep video panels to two people and in-person panels to three.

Beyond size, consider diversity. Candidates should see representation across gender, ethnicity, and professional backgrounds. This not only supports inclusion, it sends a message about your company’s values.

If a candidate only meets people from one demographic, it can raise concerns about your culture and commitment to diversity. Be intentional in your panel selection and ensure a mix of perspectives.

5. Feedback: Share constructive insights at every stage

Feedback is one of the most valuable aspects of the interview process—yet it’s often overlooked. Whether a candidate is progressing or being rejected, feedback helps them learn, grow, and feel respected.

Positive feedback reinforces strengths and builds confidence. Constructive feedback helps candidates prepare for future stages or understand why they weren’t selected.

Even a brief note can make a big difference. It shows that you value the candidate’s time and effort and that your process is thoughtful and fair.

Final thoughts: Your interview process is your brand

The interview experience reflects on you and your company brand. In the legal sector, where reputation is everything, this cannot be overstated. Candidates talk. They share experiences with peers, mentors, and recruiters. A poor process today can affect your ability to hire tomorrow.

By investing in a structured, respectful, and inclusive recruitment process, you not only attract better talent, you build a stronger, more resilient brand. Legal professionals want to work for organizations that value people, communicate clearly, and operate with integrity. Your interview process is your first opportunity to show that you do.

To discuss the General Counsel hiring process in more detail, or your career – please reach out to Georgia Morgan-Wynne.

Featured Content

Smiley person engaged with others around office

Legal readiness and enterprise value: what professional services firms must get right before investment or sale

  • Posted Oktober 22, 2026
Contents Share Key insights Private equity investment continues to reshape the professional services market.   While much of the activity to date has focused on accountancy and financial advisory businesses, investors are increasingly looking at consulting, executive search, compliance, legal services and other specialist advisory firms. Recent transactions involving businesses such as Azets, Cooper Parry and […]
Businesswoman with diary and pen by colleagues

Why risk management skills are increasingly critical for legal professionals 

  • Posted Oktober 22, 2026
Contents Share Key insights The role of in-house legal teams has evolved significantly in recent years. Legal professionals are not just expected to advise after an issue arises. They are increasingly asked to anticipate potential problems, assess their impact and help organizations mitigate business risk.  This is backed by the latest data from our 2026 […]
Group of happy entrepreneurs working on a meeting in the office.

Why lawyers are leaving law firms for in-house technology companies

  • Posted Oktober 20, 2026
Contents Share Key insights The legal profession is experiencing a notable shift. Changing workplace culture, personal and professional goals, and the enticing growth of technology companies are driving a move from private practice to in-house.  While moving from private practice to in-house is not new, the pace at which lawyers are gravitating towards high-growth technology […]